From my old livejournal community 'splodefromugly'

the Hag-fish!
True. Too painfully true.Hermskii wrote:(cricket sound)...
(cricket sound)...
George Carlin wrote: Nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. That's what the owners count on. The fact that Americans will probably remain willfully ignorant.......
One could sometimes wish that a story would stay local, especially when you live in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) and almost all that you get to hear on the news is more about the Mayor Rob Ford scandal. I was at the dentist office on Wednesday and the young lady that was cleaning my teeth asked me if I'd heard about it. I told her that I had no choice in the matter. We had a chuckle about that. Then she told me that a friend of hers is from Switzerland, and had just returned back to Canada after visiting family back home. The story is all over the front pages in Switzerland.Dr.Flay wrote:I noticed something recently I was not aware of.
Something so common in America, it is not seen as an issue, so does not even come up in conversation.
Exclusive rights to a news story.
I have been shocked by local news stories that stay "local" due to having an exclusive deal.
For example, in the UK when a police-officer is found guilty of an offence, the whole UK gets to know about it (and the rest of the world).
Whereas in America a story involving a Police officer beating, molesting or raping a hand-cuffed woman, can stay very local news.
Sites like Youtube are going to be the only place you can get a fuller picture.
Unless it becomes against the law to have an exclusive deal over a public-interest story, I can only see the news becoming more self-interested.
Youtube needs its own news channel (except that it is a commonly blocked site).
There are no wise few. Every aristocracy that has ever existed has behaved, in all essential points, exactly like a small mob. -- G. K. Chesterton